A decision on the inherited repair duty should be judged at the stone stair housing row at Old Clock Court, where the rule changes an ordinary route, shift or service. Date every record and distinguish a current rule from a custom that has simply lasted a long time. The current file is the Year fifth, late winter window 2 review, not a permanent settlement of every future case.
The lease addenda, repair invoices and tenant-held copies lists 97 repair duties with a current amount and review date; the previous window lists 102. Lucien Vale checked both against the original record checked against the date it was amended and used. The difference matters because how a resident can question a repair duty that predates the current lease copy.
The board says the addendum remains in force. Tenants ask for an amount and an end date before renewal. Those objections deserve a clear answer. They are not a reason to keep an uncheckable rule simply because its wording is familiar.
A useful decision names who will do the work, which count will change and when the result comes back to the public table. In this case, an old addendum names a repair share without stating how long it lasts.
The board recorded the outcome that it retained the current schedule and published the records supporting it.
