A review of entry logs, temperature marks and member invoices finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the common cold store beside South Arch. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: the store changes its cooling schedule between the late and early market.
The entry logs, temperature marks and member invoices lists 20 hours held inside the posted temperature range; the previous window lists 17. Adrian Veil checked both against dated handoffs followed from dispatch to the last public stop. The source was checked against a second copy held by Marek Voss. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The cooperative counts powered hours. Members ask for a temperature record at the time goods change hands. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how members share a cooling cost when the store uses different schedules.
Alimited schedule trial begins with a public end date. The Year second, late winter window 1 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The store will add a transfer reading to each member invoice.
