Start with route maintenance agreement and closure notices from both towns. It is the source used to decide how travelers receive one closure time when the crews work on different schedules; it is not the decision itself. The rule only works if the source describes conditions at the covered path through the south ridge.
Known: the current file counts 78 closures posted at both route entrances before work begins, compared with 78 in the prior window. The council records a decision for this window and its reason. The entries have dates and a named clerk.
Disputed: Each crew posts its own interval. Travelers ask which notice applies where the two sections meet. One side emphasizes the posted total; the other points to the path has two maintenance crews with separate notice boards.
Why it matters: the decision determines which residents can rely on the service and which staff must carry out the change. The file does not settle that by itself.
Next: The board recorded the outcome that it retained the current schedule and published the records supporting it.
